Depreciation Schedule

In This Article

• Under U.S. GAAP accounting, what is the intended purpose of depreciation?
• Why are public companies incentivized to use the straight-line depreciation approach?
• If depreciation is a non-cash expense, how does it impact net income?
• How does the relationship between depreciation and capex shift as companies mature?

How to Calculate the Depreciation Expense

On the income statement, depreciation will be embedded within either the cost of goods sold (COGS) or the operating expenses line. As such, depreciation reduces taxable income, which leads to lower net income (i.e., the “bottom line”).

However, depreciation is added back on the cash flow statement as it is a non-cash expense – this means that there was no actual cash outflow despite depreciation being classified as an expense on the income statement and reducing earnings.

Depreciation is used under U.S. GAAP accrual accounting due to the matching principle, which attempts to recognize expenses in the same period as when the coinciding revenue was generated.

Depreciation Schedule Formula

Once purchased, PP&E is a non-current (i.e. long-term) asset that continues to provide benefits to the company for the duration of its useful life, which is an estimate of how long the asset will continue to be used and be of service to the company. The depreciation expense is scheduled over the number of years corresponding to the useful life of the respective asset.

Depreciation Expense Formula

• Depreciation Expense = (Total PP&E Cost – Salvage Value) / Useful Life Assumption

Depreciation represents the allocation of the one-time capital expenditure cash outflow throughout the useful life of the fixed asset – in an effort to decrease the value of the asset on the balance sheet as it helps produce revenue for the company.

While depreciation is treated as a non-cash expense and added back on the cash flow statement, the expense reduces the tax burden for the period since it is tax-deductible.

Depreciation is an important consideration in order to understand the true cash flow profile of a company since it is a non-cash expense and can often be affected by discretionary assumptions by the company (i.e. determining the useful life).

This often results in some “noise” when evaluating the net income as recorded on the income statement and is why the cash flow statement is also necessary to evaluate a company’s performance.

Depreciation Schedule Illustrative Example

For example, consider a manufacturing company that purchases a machine for $1 million, and it expects the machine will be able to produce widgets for the next 10 years (its useful life). Assuming the company pays for the machine in all cash, that $1 million in cash is now out the door, no matter what.

For U.S. GAAP financial reporting purposes, however, depreciation is used to spread out that initial $1 million cash outlay (or CapEx spend) for the machine through its 10-year useful life.

This “smooths out” the company’s income statement so that rather than showing the $1 million expense entirely this year, that $1 million is effectively being spread out over 10 years as depreciation.

In theory, this is a more accurate representation of the operational performance of the company, since the expenditure required to purchase the machine is recognized across the same 10-year period as the machine is still generating revenue (by producing widgets).

Straight-Line Depreciation vs. Accelerated Depreciation Schedule

There are various depreciation methodologies, but the most common type is called “straight-line” depreciation. Under this method, the carrying value of PP&E on the balance sheet is decreased evenly per year until the residual value has diminished to zero.

The salvage value is defined as the value of the asset at the end of its useful life. Practically, salvage value can be thought of as the amount at which a company can sell the old asset at the end of its useful life – oftentimes, this ends up being the value of the parts (i.e. for a machine, it could mean the residual value of the steel used to make the machine).

The majority of companies use a salvage value assumption in which the remaining value of the asset becomes zero by the end of the useful life. In doing so, the depreciation expense each year will be higher, and the depreciation tax benefits are fully realized if the salvage value is assumed to be zero (and this is the common assumption used in straight-line depreciation).

If a company were to purchase $100k of PP&E with a useful life estimation of 5 years, then the depreciation expense would be $20k each year under straight-line depreciation.

Therefore, $100k in PP&E was purchased at the end of the initial period (Year 0) and the value of the purchased PP&E on the balance sheet decreases by $20k each year until it reaches zero by the end of its useful life (Year 5).

There are other approaches to calculating depreciation, most notably accelerated accounting, which depreciates the asset faster in earlier years. In turn, this methodology lowers net income more in early years as compared to later years.

However, considering how much publicly traded companies care about their net income and earnings per share (EPS) figures – most opt for straight-line depreciation.

For GAAP reporting purposes, most companies prefer straight-line depreciation because lower depreciation will be recorded in the earlier years of the asset’s useful life than under accelerated depreciation. As a result, companies using straight-line depreciation will show higher net income and EPS in the initial years.

Under the accelerated depreciation method, net income and EPS would be lower in the earlier periods and then be higher relative to straight-line depreciation in later years – however, companies tend to prioritize near-term earnings performance.

The assumption behind accelerated depreciation is that the asset drops more of its value in the earlier stages of its lifecycle, allowing for more deductions earlier on.

The accelerated approach eventually begins to show less depreciation on the income statement further into the asset’s useful life, but to reiterate, companies still prefer straight-line depreciation because of the timing (i.e., avoid missing EPS figures on earnings releases).

At the end of the day, the cumulative depreciation amount is exactly the same, as is the timing of the actual cash outflow, but the difference lies in the net income and EPS impact for reporting purposes.

Depreciation and Capex/Revenue Growth Relationship

The “quick and dirty” method for projecting CapEx and depreciation is as follows:

1. CapEx: % of Revenue
2. Annual Depreciation: % of Capex (or Revenue)

Capital expenditures are directly tied to “top line” revenue growth – and depreciation is the reduction of the PP&E purchase value (i.e., expensing of CapEx).

CapEx can be forecasted as a percentage of revenue using historical data as a reference point. In addition to following historical trends, management guidance and industry averages should also be referenced as a guide for forecasting CapEx.

In turn, depreciation can be projected as a percentage of CapEx (or as a percentage of revenue, with depreciation as a % of CapEx calculated separately as a sanity check).

That said, companies experiencing high growth usually will have CapEx as a relatively greater percentage of their revenues. The more a company has spent on CapEx in recent years, the more depreciation the company incurs in its near-term future.

High-growth companies tend to spend heavily on growth CapEx (i.e., optional expenditures to fund growth and expansion plans), and therefore usually exhibit depreciation/CapEx ratios that far exceed 100%.

On the other hand, the CapEx of low-growth companies will consist of a smaller percentage of revenue.

For mature businesses experiencing low, stagnating or declining growth, the depreciation/CapEx ratio converges near 100%, as the majority of total CapEx is related to maintenance CapEx.

Maintenance CapEx refers to the routine spending required for operations to continue (e.g., to replace equipment, perform refurbishments).

But if the company is still continuously purchasing fixed assets, it should require more time for the depreciation/CapEx ratio to converge closer to 100% (i.e., until capex spend is scaled back).

Depreciation Schedule Concept Explained

Another approach to project depreciation is to build out a PP&E schedule based on the company’s existing PP&E and incremental PP&E purchases.

Under this approach, the average remaining useful life for existing PP&E and useful life assumptions by management (or a rough approximation) is necessary for projecting new CapEx.

While more technical and complex, the waterfall approach typically does not yield a substantially differing result compared to projecting CapEx as a percentage of revenue and depreciation as a percentage of CapEx.

For a complete depreciation waterfall schedule to be put together, more data from the company would be required to track the PP&E currently in use and the remaining useful life of each. Additionally, management plans for future CapEx spending and the approximate useful life assumptions for each new purchase are necessary.

If the data is readily accessible (e.g., a portfolio company of a private equity firm), then this granular approach would actually be feasible, as well as be more informative than the simple percentage-based projection approach.

But in the absence of such data, the number of assumptions required based on approximations rather than internal company information makes the method ultimately be less credible.

Depreciation Schedule – Excel Template

Now, we will go through a depreciation waterfall schedule forecast build. Fill out the form below to download the template that goes along with our step-by-step tutorial:

Submit

Email provided

Your Download is Ready

Submitting ...

Revenue and CapEx Projection

In our hypothetical scenario, the company is projected to have $10mm in revenue in the first year of the forecast, 2021. The revenue growth rate will decrease by 1.0% each year until reaching 3.0% in 2025.

CapEx as a percentage of revenue is 3.0% in 2021 and will subsequently decrease by 0.1% each year as the company continues to mature and growth decreases.

By 2025, CapEx as a percentage of revenue will be 2.6%.

Note that for purposes of simplicity, we are only projecting the incremental new capex.

In a full depreciation schedule, the depreciation for old PP&E and new PP&E would need to be separated out and added together.

Depreciation Schedule – Waterfall Build

For the depreciation schedule, we will use the “OFFSET” function in Excel to grab the CapEx figures for each year.

While not overly useful for our simplistic model, it can help conserve time in more complex builds at the per-asset level. Regarding the inputs for the formula:

1. The first input is the reference cell, which is the cell to the left of the CapEx amount
2. Next, zero is entered for the row since we want to remain on Line 19
3. Lastly, we link to the “Year X” cell on the left for the column input

In the first year, the PP&E balance in 2021 comes from the $300k corresponding CapEx spend. Here, we are assuming the CapEx outflow is right at the beginning of the period (BOP) – and thus, the 2021 depreciation is $300k in CapEx divided by the 5-year useful life assumption. This comes out to $60k each year, which will remain constant until the salvage value reaches zero.

The formula for the annual depreciation is as follows.

The completed forecast for Year 1 has been highlighted in the screenshot below. As a sanity check, each of the numbers should be the same since we are using the straight-line approach in our example. And while not applicable for our projection, longer-term models should use a “MAX” function with the remaining salvage value to make sure it does not dip below zero.

Then, we can extend this formula and methodology for the remainder of the forecast. For 2022, the new CapEx is $307k, which after dividing by 5 years, comes out to be about $61k in annual depreciation.

Once this depreciation calculation process is repeated for all five years, the “Total Depreciation” line item sums up the depreciation amount for the current year and all previous periods to date. For example, the total depreciation for 2023 is comprised of the $60k of depreciation from Year 1, $61k of depreciation from Year 2, and then $62k of depreciation from Year 3 – which comes out to $184k in total.

Returning to the “PP&E, net” line item, the formula is the prior year’s PP&E balance, less CapEx, and less depreciation.

PP&E Formula

• Current Year PP&E = Prior Year PP&E – CapEx – Depreciation

Since CapEx was input as a negative, the CapEx will increase the PP&E amount as intended (otherwise, the formula would have added CapEx if the positive sign convention had been used).

In closing, the net PP&E balance for each period is shown below in the finished model output.

While the purpose of this post was primarily to illustrate how depreciation can be forecasted, PP&E, CapEx, and depreciation are three intertwined metrics that ultimately go hand-in-hand.